In today’s
global business environment, the best laid plans, the greatest technology, and
the best equipment will produce average results unless they are organized and
utilized by a skilled and proficient leader. You must be able to inspire people
to follow your lead. No matter how technically capable you are, you won’t be
effective as a leader unless you gain the willing cooperation of others. You
are the team’s coach, captain, quarterback, cheerleader, and fan all rolled
into one. You are the critical lynch pin between the organization’s goals and
your team. Your success in leading your department, team, or business unit to
greater results and profitability lies in your true leadership ability.
It wasn’t
always this way. An American mechanical engineer, Frederick W. Taylor (1856 –
1915) who sought to improve industrial efficiency, created a set of principles
which came to be called Scientific Management. The basic assumption was a
supervisor of the past could derive maximum productivity from workers by scientifically
breaking down the required production tasks into the smallest possible units,
and then assigning each worker a definite task with a definite time allocation
and a definite manner for getting the task done. Other industrial engineers
soon added to the basic principles of Scientific Management with a host of
techniques and practices: written instruction cards for each task,
sophisticated scheduling systems, job descriptions, and a lot of time and
motions studies. None of these practices were inherently bad.
In fact, if you
study modern supervisory texts, you’ll find that some of the same techniques
that came out of Scientific Management are still advocated as being essential
for good management. But, by the mid 1930’s, the basic premise of Scientific
Management was in question. It was a good system, in theory, that had never
been able to deliver the results it so thoroughly sought. Why not? Scientific
Management was an attempt to engineer human activity without reasonable
consideration for the human element. It was an attempt to engineer activity in
much the same way someone would program a computer. By the mid 1930’s,
theorists from the human relations movement began to show that motivated
workers delivered better results.
These studies,
and countless others, have all yielded a common truth: the best systems and
procedures will produce limited results unless they are administered with full
recognition of the fact that the team members who are to implement the systems
and procedures are human, and need to be managed, motivated, and guided by an
effective leader.
As a team
leader you must do much more than manage and supervise. You must gain the trust
and willing cooperation of those who look to you for leadership. You must learn
to use all of your strengths by recognizing, developing, and utilizing the
talents of your team. Because of the function and role of a team leader, it’s
obvious that good team leaders are critically important to the success of an
organization.
Studies at
Stanford Research Institute, Harvard University, and the Carnegie Foundation
have proven that 85% of the reason you get a job, keep a job, and move ahead in
that job has more to do with people skills and people development. Remember, a
team leader is responsible for: planning, organizing, staffing, motivating, and
evaluating results. Most importantly, they need to exhibit an intangible
collection of skills and abilities we commonly identify as leadership. A team
leader has to be able to get results through his or her team!
No comments:
Post a Comment